RETHINKING SECURITY IN POST 9/11 PAKISTAN: ARGUING FOR HUMAN SECURITY

  • Javaria Nizam

Abstract

PURPOSESCORE

Explicitly stated, important topic, fits conference goals (3)

Purpose stated and related to conference theme (2)

Not explicitly stated but discernable, narrowly related to conference theme (1)

Unclear (0)

SIGNIFICANCE SCORE

Important issue with significant outcomes (3)

Key issue of concern may be a pilot study or work in progress (2)

Not a key or innovative topic, weak results (1)

Unimportant issue (0)

ORIGINALITYSCORE

Original work (new problem, solution or perspective) that does not duplicate previous work (3)

Replicates important work done by others (2)

Duplicates work done by others, without significant findings (1)

Old idea (0)

METHODOLOGYSCORE

Sound methodology, design clear and appropriate for the study (3) 

Design not clearly stated but methods seem appropriate (2)

Poor: Design unclear (1)

No design stated (0)

STATISTICALANALYSISSCORE

Appropriate data analysis methods (2)

Data analysis described but not comprehensive (1)

Inappropriate (0)

RESULTS/DISCUSSIONSCORE

Appropriate, explained well. Likely to provide new knowledge (3)

Not well described but discernable (2)

Outcomes not clear (1)

Proposed study (0)

OVERALLIMPRESSION

Accept for Oral (Podium) Presentation  ≥ 12

Accept for Round Table Discussion (2)≥ 08

Accept for Poster (1)                          ≥ 05

Do not accept (0)                                < 05

Published
2020-12-15
How to Cite
Javaria Nizam. (2020). RETHINKING SECURITY IN POST 9/11 PAKISTAN: ARGUING FOR HUMAN SECURITY. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ERI), 3(2), 3-4. Retrieved from http://eri.com.pk/index.php/eri/article/view/98
Section
Articles